• Posts Tagged ‘continuation in part’

    Assignment of a Part of a Continuation-in-Part?

    by  • September 30, 2012 • patent • 0 Comments

    Plaintiff AB Coaster Holdings Inc. claimed to be the owner of patents that were subject to terminal disclaimers.  Some of the patents were expressly assigned and some were not.  Here are the pairings: ‘633 (assigned) and ‘079 (not expressly assigned)‘445 (not expressly assigned) and ‘263 (assigned)‘079 (not expressly assigned) and ‘263 (assigned) The defendant...

    Read more →

    Someone Screwed Up

    by  • June 19, 2010 • patent

    The Patent Prospector summarizes a Federal Circuit review of a botched effort to claim priority to an earlier-filed application. The child was filed without the first page, so there was no express claim of priority to its parent. Result? Patent invalid because it was anticipated by the factual, but not legal, predecessor. Post here....

    Read more →